{"help":"Return the metadata of a dataset (package) and its resources. :param id: the id or name of the dataset :type id: string","success":true,"result":[{"id":"c738e558-e124-42d6-9c1b-011ca807863e","name":"contaminant-and-biological-effect-data-1999-2018-national-performance-framework-clean-seas","title":"Contaminant and biological effect data 1999-2018 for the National Performance Framework Clean Seas Indicator 2019 and Scotland\u0027s Marine Assessment 2020","author_email":"marinescotland@gov.scot","maintainer":"Scottish Government - Marine Directorate Data Publications","maintainer_email":"marinedirectorate@gov.scot","notes":"\u003Cp\u003EThe National Performance Framework Clean Seas Indicator 2019 is the percentage of assessments of metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in biota and sediment showing concentrations that are unlikely to harm marine organisms in Scottish waters.  The Indicator is based on a series of regional assessments in which the mean concentration of each contaminant is compared to the Environmental Assessment Criteria (EAC) or an equivalent threshold when the EAC has not been established.  The regional assessments are themselves based on the 2019 assessment of the UK\u0027s Clean Seas Environment Monitoring Programme (CSEMP).\u003C\/p\u003E\n","url":"https:\/\/data.marine.gov.scot\/dataset\/contaminant-and-biological-effect-data-1999-2018-national-performance-framework-clean-seas","state":"Active","private":true,"revision_timestamp":"Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:59","metadata_created":"Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:44","metadata_modified":"Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:59","creator_user_id":"ef1d5231-9817-4ea3-875e-aadc55addee0","type":"Dataset","resources":[{"id":"00f00e23-23ed-4de8-b4fb-4039c89fd488","revision_id":"","url":"https:\/\/data.marine.gov.scot\/sites\/default\/files\/\/biota_data_7.csv","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe variables in biota_data.csv describe the contaminant and biological effect data in biota used to construct the National Performance Framework Clean Seas Indicator 2019. The data are also used as the basis for the assessment of the status and trends of selected contaminant and biological effect groups for Scotland\u0027s Marine Assessment 2020. The column headers are:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EseriesID\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: timeseries identifier\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 1313\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: identifies the data (typically a station \/ contaminant \/ species combination) that were grouped together into a timeseries and modelled to assess status and trends\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Estation\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station identifier\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 104\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: monitoring station \u2013 links to station information in biota_stations.csv\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Especies\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: species\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 6\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nGadus morhua:       AphiaID = 126436\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLimanda limanda:    AphiaID = 127139\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nMytilus edulis:     AphiaID = 140480\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNucella lapillus:   AphiaID = 140403\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nPlatichthys flesus: AphiaID = 127141\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nPleuronectes platessa:  AphiaID = 127143\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Esex\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: sex\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: F, I, M, X\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: see \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/vocab.ices.dk\/?ref=45\u0022\u003EICES reference codes for SEXCO\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Eyear\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: monitoring year\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: discrete\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 1999, 2018\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: for some data suppliers, monitoring is in winter and e.g. sampling in December 2017 and January 2018 would be regarded as having come from the same monitoring year\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Edate\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: sampling date\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: discrete\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 1999-01-17, 2018-09-17\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EsampleID\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: sample identifier\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels:  9324\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: data from different matrices (e.g. LI and MU) in the same fish have different sampleIDs\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Ematrix\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: sample matrix\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: BI, LI, LIS9, MU, SB\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: see \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/vocab.ices.dk\/?ref=55\u0022\u003EICES reference codes for MATRX\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Egroup\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: contaminant group\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: BDE, bioeffect, CB, imposex, metal, PAH.parent\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nBDE = polybrominated diphenyl ethers\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nbioeffect = biological effects\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nCB = polychlorinated biphenyls\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nPAH.parent = parent polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Edeterminand\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: contaminant\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 28\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: see \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/vocab.ices.dk\/?ref=37\u0022\u003EICES reference codes for PARAM\u003C\/a\u003E; data submitted as CHRTR and VDSI have been relabelled as CHR and VDS respectively\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Emetoa\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: method of chemical analysis\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 17\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: see \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/vocab.ices.dk\/?ref=173\u0022\u003EICES reference codes for METOA\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Econcentration\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: concentration of contaminant or equivalent for biological effects\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: ug\/kg ww (contaminants), ug\/ml (PYR1OHEQ), pmol\/min\/mg protein (EROD), st (VDS)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0, 38900\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: all contaminant concentrations are expressed on a wet weight basis\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Eqflag\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: less-than qualifier for the concentration measurement\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: \u0022\u0022, \u0022\u0026lt;\u0022\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\n\u201c\u0026lt;\u201d indicates a value below the limit of detection\u003Cbr \/\u003E\n\u0022\u201d indicates a value above the limit of detection or where there is no limit of detection (e.g. VDS measurements)\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Euncertainty\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: uncertainty in the concentration measurement\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: as for concentration\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.00069, 2647\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: analytical uncertainty expressed as the standard deviation; not applicable to some biological effects measurements\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003ELNMEA\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: mean length\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: cm\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.42, 84\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: mean length of monitoring organism in pool; \u003Cstrong\u003Ethere are unit errors in these data, so the data should be used with caution\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EDRYWT\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: dry weight of the sample\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: %\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 7.73, 35.2\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: all values are above the limit of detection\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EDRYWT.uncertainty\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: uncertainty in the dry weight measurement\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: %\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.66, 1.57\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: analytical uncertainty expressed as the standard deviation\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003ELIPIDWT\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: lipid weight of the sample\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: %\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.1, 56.2\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: all values are above the limit of detection\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003ELIPIDWT.uncertainty\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: uncertainty in the lipid weight measurement\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: %\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.019, 5.95\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: analytical uncertainty expressed as the standard deviation\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Enoinp\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: number of individuals pooled in the sample\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: nr\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: discrete\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 1, 159\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EFEMALEPOP\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: % of the sample that are females\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: %\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 17, 100\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: Used to model imposex data when submitted as a pooled sample\u003C\/p\u003E\n","format":"csv","state":"Active","revision_timestamp":"Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:50","name":"Biota data 1999-2018 for the National Performance Framework Clean Seas Indicator 2019 and Scotland\u0027s Marine Assessment 2020","mimetype":"text\/csv","size":"5.55 MB","created":"Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:50","resource_group_id":"f96d4bd9-9492-4e8a-b459-d66dfec8d920","last_modified":"Date changed  Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:50"},{"id":"989f80ed-b6ed-4059-8e20-8bc802afd62e","revision_id":"","url":"https:\/\/data.marine.gov.scot\/sites\/default\/files\/\/biota_stations_7.csv","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe variables in biota_stations.csv describe the biota monitoring stations used to construct the National Performance Framework Clean Seas Indicator 2019. The stations are also used for the assessment of the status and trends of selected contaminant and biological effect groups for Scotland\u0027s Marine Assessment 2020. The column headers are:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Eregion\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: assessment region\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 4\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: the \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/marine.gov.scot\/datafiles\/npf\/clean_seas\/2019\/Scottish_biogeographic_regions.pdf\u0022\u003Eregions\u003C\/a\u003E are the Scottish component of the \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk\/20141203172025\/http:\/chartingprogress.defra.gov.uk\/regional-basis-charting-progress-2\u0022\u003Ebiogeographic regions\u003C\/a\u003E used for \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk\/20141203170558\/http:\/chartingprogress.defra.gov.uk\/\u0022\u003ECharting Progress 2\u003C\/a\u003E and for UK MSFD reporting purposes. There are 5 regions in Scottish waters, but there are no stations in the Atlantic North-West Approaches because it is difficult to sample. The Northern North Sea, Minches and Western Scotland and Irish Sea (Clyde \u0026amp; Solway) are used in the Clean Seas Indicator. The Scottish Continental Shelf is not used in the Indicator because it is difficult to get sufficient spatial coverage for regional assessments for both biota and sediment.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Estation\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station identifier\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 104\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Elatitude\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station latitude\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: decimal degrees\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 54.75, 61.1\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: these are nominal positions: sampling occurs in a pre-defined area centred on this position.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Elongitude\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station longitude\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: decimal degrees\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: -7.05, 1.2\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: these are nominal positions: sampling occurs in a pre-defined area centred on this position.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EMSTAT\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station type\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: B, RH, I\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nB = baseline stations in remote areas subject only to diffuse inputs of contaminants\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRH = representative stations broadly representative of contaminant levels in the region\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nI = impacted stations located close to a point source\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EWLTYP\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: stratum typography\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: Estuary, Coast, Open Sea\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nEstuary = WFD transitional water\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nCoast = WFD coastal water\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nOpen Sea = marine water (stratum not covered by WFD)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","format":"csv","state":"Active","revision_timestamp":"Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:52","name":"Biota Stations 1999-2018 used to collect data for the National Performance Framework Clean Seas Indicator 2019 and Scotland\u0027s Marine Assessment 2020","mimetype":"text\/csv","size":"8.4 KB","created":"Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:52","resource_group_id":"f96d4bd9-9492-4e8a-b459-d66dfec8d920","last_modified":"Date changed  Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:52"},{"id":"ff52f2fd-df4c-4e9a-bc2f-9ab52c76b753","revision_id":"","url":"https:\/\/data.marine.gov.scot\/sites\/default\/files\/\/biota_summaries_3.csv","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe variables in biota_summaries.csv describe summary measures of status and trends for contaminant and biological effect timeseries in biota. The summary measures are used to construct the National Performance Framework Clean Seas Indicator 2019. They are also used for the assessment of the status and trends of selected contaminant and biological effect groups for Scotland\u0027s Marine Assessment 2020. The column headers are:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EseriesID\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: timeseries identifier\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 835\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: the raw data for each timeseries can be found in biota_data.csv\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Eregion\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: assessment region\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 4\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: the \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/marine.gov.scot\/datafiles\/npf\/clean_seas\/2019\/Scottish_biogeographic_regions.pdf\u0022\u003Eregions\u003C\/a\u003E are the Scottish component of the \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk\/20141203172025\/http:\/chartingprogress.defra.gov.uk\/regional-basis-charting-progress-2\u0022\u003Ebiogeographic regions\u003C\/a\u003E used for \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk\/20141203170558\/http:\/chartingprogress.defra.gov.uk\/\u0022\u003ECharting Progress 2\u003C\/a\u003E and for UK MSFD reporting purposes. There are 5 regions in Scottish waters, but there are no stations in the Atlantic North-West Approaches because it is difficult to sample. The Northern North Sea, Minches and Western Scotland and Irish Sea (Clyde \u0026amp; Solway) are used in the Clean Seas Indicator. The Scottish Continental Shelf is not used in the Indicator because it is difficult to get sufficient spatial coverage for regional assessments for both biota and sediment.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Estation\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station identifier\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 95\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Elatitude\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station latitude\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: decimal degrees\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 54.75, 60.78\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: these are nominal positions: sampling occurs in a pre-defined area centred on this position.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Elongitude\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station longitude\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: decimal degrees\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: -6.38, -0.62\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: these are nominal positions: sampling occurs in a pre-defined area centred on this position.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EMSTAT\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station type\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: B, RH, I\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nB = baseline stations in remote areas subject only to diffuse inputs of contaminants\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRH = representative stations broadly representative of contaminant levels in the region\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nI = impacted stations located close to a point source\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Especies\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: species\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 5\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLimanda limanda:    AphiaID = 127139\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nMytilus edulis:     AphiaID = 140480\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNucella lapillus:   AphiaID = 140403\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nPlatichthys flesus: AphiaID = 127141\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nPleuronectes platessa:  AphiaID = 127143\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Esex\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: sex\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: Female, Male\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: only provided for EROD timeseries which are analysed separately by sex\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Egroup\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: contaminant group\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: BDE, bioeffect, CB, imposex, metal, PAH.parent\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nBDE = polybrominated diphenyl ethers\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nbioeffect = biological effects\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nCB = polychlorinated biphenyls\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nPAH.parent = parent polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Edeterminand\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: contaminant\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 28\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: see \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/vocab.ices.dk\/?ref=37\u0022\u003EICES reference codes for PARAM\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Elast_year\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: last year with monitoring data\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: integer\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 2013, 2018\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Estatus\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the estimated (natural) logarithm of the mean concentration in the last monitoring year\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: log ug\/kg ww (contaminants), log ug\/ml (PYR1OHEQ), log pmol\/min\/mg protein (EROD)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: -3.9, 7.78\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: for VDS, status is the square root of the estimated mean VDS in the last monitoring year\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Ese_status\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the standard error on the estimated log mean concentration in the last monitoring year\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: log ug\/kg ww (contaminants), log ug\/ml (PYR1OHEQ), log pmol\/min\/mg protein (EROD)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.025, 1.36\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: for VDS, se_status is the standard error of the estimated square root mean VDS in the last monitoring year\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EEAC_id\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the identifier of the EAC measure or its equivalent\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: EAC, EC, FEQG\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nEAC = Environmental Assessment Criterion\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nEC = European Commission food standard\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nFEQG = Federal Environmental Quality Guideline\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EEAC\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the value of the EAC or its equivalent\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: ug\/kg ww (contaminants), ug\/ml (PYR1OHEQ), pmol\/min\/mg protein (EROD), st (VDS)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.32, 1500\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Estatus_EAC\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the log ratio of the estimated mean concentration in the last monitoring year to the EAC (or its equivalent)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: dimensionless\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: -6.7, 2\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nFor contaminants, PYR1OHEQ and EROD, a value above \/ below 0 indicates that the estimated mean concentration in the last monitoring year is above \/ below the EAC; the standard error is given by the variable se_status\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nFor VDS, status_EAC is the ratio of the estimated square root mean VDS in the last monitoring year to the square root EAC; a value above \/ below 1 indicates that the estimated mean VDS in the last monitoring year is above \/ below the EAC; the standard error is given by the variable se_status divided by the square root EAC\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EBAC\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the Background Assessment Concentration (BAC)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: ug\/kg ww (contaminants), ug\/ml (PYR1OHEQ), pmol\/min\/mg protein (EROD), st (VDS)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.011, 212\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Estatus_BAC\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the log ratio of the estimated mean concentration in the last monitoring year to the BAC\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: dimensionless\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: -3.1, 7.02\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nFor contaminants, PYR1OHEQ and EROD, a value above \/ below 0 indicates that the estimated mean concentration in the last monitoring year is above \/ below the BAC; the standard error is given by the variable se_status\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nFor VDS, status_BAC is the ratio of the estimated square root mean VDS in the last monitoring year to the square root BAC; a value above \/ below 1 indicates that the estimated mean VDS in the last monitoring year is above \/ below the BAC; the standard error is given by the variable se_status divided by the square root BAC\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Etrend\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the estimated yearly change in log concentration\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: log ug\/kg ww\/y (contaminants), log ug\/ml\/y (PYR1OHEQ), log pmol\/min\/mg protein\/y (EROD)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: -44, 31\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: for VDS, trend is the estimated odds ratio of the VDS of an individual being above the EAC in one year relative to the previous year; values below \/ above 1 indicate a decreasing \/ increasing trend in VDS\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Ese_trend\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the standard error on the estimated yearly change in log concentration\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: dimensionless\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.014, 15.2\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: for VDS, se_trend is the standard error on the estimated odds ratio of the VDS of an individual being above the EAC in one year relative to the previous year\u003C\/p\u003E\n","format":"csv","state":"Active","revision_timestamp":"Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:54","name":"Biota Summaries for the National Performance Framework Clean Seas Indicator 2019 and Scotland\u0027s Marine Assessment 2020","mimetype":"text\/csv","size":"220.28 KB","created":"Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:54","resource_group_id":"f96d4bd9-9492-4e8a-b459-d66dfec8d920","last_modified":"Date changed  Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:54"},{"id":"ac57edb6-32ea-46e1-bb36-10be9a670c26","revision_id":"","url":"https:\/\/data.marine.gov.scot\/sites\/default\/files\/\/sediment_data_7.csv","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe variables in sediment_data.csv describe the contaminant data in sediment used to construct the National Performance Framework Clean Seas Indicator 2019. The data are also used as the basis for the assessment ofthe status and trends of selected contaminant groups in sediment for Scotland\u0027s Marine Assessment 2020.The column headers are:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EseriesID\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: timeseries identifier\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 1191\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: identifies the data (a station \/ contaminant combination) that were grouped together into a timeseries and modelled to assess status and trends\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Estation\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station identifier\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 51\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: monitoring station \u2013 links to station information in sediment_stations.csv\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Eyear\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: monitoring year\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: discrete\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 1999, 2018\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: for some data suppliers, monitoring is in winter and e.g. sampling in December 2017 and January 2018 would be regarded as having come from the same monitoring year\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Edate\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: sampling date\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: discrete\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 1999-01-18, 2018-01-15\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EsampleID\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: sample identifier\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels:  1958\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Ematrix\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: sample matrix\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: SED63, SEDTOT\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: see \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/vocab.ices.dk\/?ref=55\u0022\u003EICES reference codes for MATRX\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Egroup\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: contaminant group\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: BDE, CB, metal, PAH.parent\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nBDE = polybrominated diphenyl ethers\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nCB = polychlorinated biphenyls\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nPAH.parent = parent polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Edeterminand\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: contaminant\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 26\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: see \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/vocab.ices.dk\/?ref=37\u0022\u003EICES reference codes for PARAM\u003C\/a\u003E; data submitted as CHRTR have been relabelled as CHR\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Emetoa\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: method of chemical analysis\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 11\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: see \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/vocab.ices.dk\/?ref=173\u0022\u003EICES reference codes for METOA\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Econcentration\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: concentration of contaminant\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: mg\/kg dw (metals), ug\/kg dw (organics)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.0015, 4080\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: all contaminant concentrations are expressed on a dry weight basis\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Eqflag\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: less-than qualifier for the concentration measurement\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: \u0022\u0022, \u0022\u0026lt;\u0022\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\n\u201c\u0026lt;\u201d indicates a value below the limit of detection\u003Cbr \/\u003E\n\u0022\u201d indicates a value above the limit of detection\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Euncertainty\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: uncertainty in the concentration measurement\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: as for concentration\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.0000075, 639\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: analytical uncertainty expressed as the standard deviation\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EnormConc\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: normalised concentration of contaminant\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: as for concentration\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.0082, 4887\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: the concentration normalised to 5% aluminium (metals) or 2.5% organic carbon (organics); the normalisation process is explained \u003Ca href=\u0022https:\/\/www.bodc.ac.uk\/projects\/data_management\/uk\/merman\/assessments_and_data_access\/csemp\/help\/assessment_methodology\/sediment\/metals.html#Normalisationhere\u0022\u003Ehere\u003C\/a\u003E; some normalised concentrations are \u2018missing\u2019 because the normaliser (aluminium or organic carbon) concentration was not reported or because the uncertainty in the normalised concentration was greater than the normalised concentration\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EnormConc.qflag\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: less-than qualifier for the normalised measurement\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: \u0022\u0022, \u0022\u0026lt;\u0022\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: see qflag\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EnormConc.uncertainty\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: uncertainty in the normalised measurement\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: as for concentration\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.00075, 887\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: analytical uncertainty expressed as the standard deviation\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EAL\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: aluminium concentration\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: %\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.12, 48.2\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: all values are above the limit of detection\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EAL.uncertainty\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: uncertainty in the aluminium measurement\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: %\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.014, 3.06\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: analytical uncertainty expressed as the standard deviation\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003ECORG\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: organic carbon concentration\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: %\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.03, 8.7\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003ECORG.qflag\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: less-than qualifier for the organic carbon measurement\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: \u0022\u0022, \u0022\u0026lt;\u0022\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: see qflag\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003ECORG.uncertainty\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: uncertainty in the organic carbon measurement\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: %\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.008, 2.86\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: analytical uncertainty expressed as the standard deviation\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EDRYWT\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: dry weight of the sample\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: %\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 8.33, 94.8\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: all values are above the limit of detection\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EDRYWT.uncertainty\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: uncertainty in the dry weight measurement\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: %\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.29, 3.35\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: analytical uncertainty expressed as the standard deviation\u003C\/p\u003E\n","format":"csv","state":"Active","revision_timestamp":"Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:56","name":"Sediment data 1999-2018 for the National Performance Framework Clean Seas Indicator 2019 and Scotland\u0027s Marine Assessment 2020","mimetype":"text\/csv","size":"6.68 MB","created":"Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:56","resource_group_id":"f96d4bd9-9492-4e8a-b459-d66dfec8d920","last_modified":"Date changed  Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:56"},{"id":"b4a0456e-d04d-44bf-bf0d-cad8becd4531","revision_id":"","url":"https:\/\/data.marine.gov.scot\/sites\/default\/files\/\/sediment_stations_7.csv","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe variables in sediment_stations.csv describe the sediment monitoring stations used to construct the National Performance Framework Clean Seas Indicator 2019. The stations are also used for the assessment of the status and trends of selected contaminant groups for Scotland\u0027s Marine Assessment 2020. The column headers are:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Eregion\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: assessment region\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 4\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: the \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/marine.gov.scot\/datafiles\/npf\/clean_seas\/2019\/Scottish_biogeographic_regions.pdf\u0022\u003Eregions\u003C\/a\u003E are the Scottish component of the \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk\/20141203172025\/http:\/chartingprogress.defra.gov.uk\/regional-basis-charting-progress-2\u0022\u003Ebiogeographic regions\u003C\/a\u003E used for \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk\/20141203170558\/http:\/chartingprogress.defra.gov.uk\/\u0022\u003ECharting Progress 2\u003C\/a\u003E and for UK MSFD reporting purposes. There are 5 regions in Scottish waters, but there are no stations in the Atlantic North-West Approaches because it is difficult to sample. The Northern North Sea, Minches and Western Scotland and Irish Sea (Clyde \u0026amp; Solway) are used in the Clean Seas Indicator. The Scottish Continental Shelf is not used in the Indicator because it is difficult to get sufficient spatial coverage for regional assessments for both biota and sediment.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Estation\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station identifier\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 51\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Elatitude\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station latitude\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: decimal degrees\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 54.77, 61.03\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: these are nominal positions: sampling occurs in a pre-defined area centred on this position.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Elongitude\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station longitude\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: decimal degrees\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: -8.58, 1.82\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: these are nominal positions: sampling occurs in a pre-defined area centred on this position.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EMSTAT\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station type\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: B, RH, I\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nB = baseline stations in remote areas subject only to diffuse inputs of contaminants\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRH = representative stations broadly representative of contaminant levels in the region\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nI = impacted stations located close to a point source\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EWLTYP\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: stratum typography\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: Estuary, Coast, Open Sea\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nEstuary = WFD transitional water\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nCoast = WFD coastal water\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nOpen Sea = marine water (stratum not covered by WFD)\u003C\/p\u003E\n","format":"csv","state":"Active","revision_timestamp":"Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:58","name":"Sediment Stations 1999-2018  used to collect data for the National Performance Framework Clean Seas Indicator 2019 and Scotland\u0027s Marine Assessment 2020","mimetype":"text\/csv","size":"4.02 KB","created":"Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:58","resource_group_id":"f96d4bd9-9492-4e8a-b459-d66dfec8d920","last_modified":"Date changed  Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:58"},{"id":"04a6c143-7c09-453c-bbcd-cd9cfc2036b6","revision_id":"","url":"https:\/\/data.marine.gov.scot\/sites\/default\/files\/\/sediment_summaries_3.csv","description":"\u003Cp\u003EThe variables in sediment_summaries.csv describe summary measures of status and trends for contaminant timeseries in sediment. The summary measures are used to construct the National Performance Framework Clean Seas Indicator 2019. They are also used for the assessment of the status and trends of selected contaminant groups for Scotland\u0027s Marine Assessment 2020. The column headers are:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EseriesID\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: timeseries identifier\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 617\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: the raw data for each timeseries can be found in sediment_data.csv\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Eregion\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: assessment region\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 4\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: the \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/marine.gov.scot\/datafiles\/npf\/clean_seas\/2019\/Scottish_biogeographic_regions.pdf\u0022\u003Eregions\u003C\/a\u003E are the Scottish component of the \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk\/20141203172025\/http:\/chartingprogress.defra.gov.uk\/regional-basis-charting-progress-2\u0022\u003Ebiogeographic regions\u003C\/a\u003E used for \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk\/20141203170558\/http:\/chartingprogress.defra.gov.uk\/\u0022\u003ECharting Progress 2\u003C\/a\u003E and for UK MSFD reporting purposes. There are 5 regions in Scottish waters, but there are no stations in the Atlantic North-West Approaches because it is difficult to sample. The Northern North Sea, Minches and Western Scotland and Irish Sea (Clyde \u0026amp; Solway) are used in the Clean Seas Indicator. The Scottish Continental Shelf is not used in the Indicator because it is difficult to get sufficient spatial coverage for regional assessments for both biota and sediment.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Estation\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station identifier\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 34\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Elatitude\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station latitude\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: decimal degrees\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 54.77, 60.04\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: these are nominal positions: sampling occurs in a pre-defined area centred on this position.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Elongitude\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station longitude\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: decimal degrees\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: -7.01, 0.91\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: these are nominal positions: sampling occurs in a pre-defined area centred on this position.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EMSTAT\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: station type\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: B, RH, I\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nB = baseline stations in remote areas subject only to diffuse inputs of contaminants\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRH = representative stations broadly representative of contaminant levels in the region\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nI = impacted stations located close to a point source\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Egroup\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: contaminant group\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: BDE, CB, metal, PAH.parent\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nBDE = polybrominated diphenyl ethers\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nCB = polychlorinated biphenyls\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nPAH.parent = parent polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Edeterminand\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: contaminant\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: 26\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: see \u003Ca href=\u0022http:\/\/vocab.ices.dk\/?ref=37\u0022\u003EICES reference codes for PARAM\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Elast_year\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: last year with monitoring data\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: integer\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 2013, 2018\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Estatus\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the estimated (natural) logarithm of the mean concentration in the last monitoring year\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: log mg\/kg dw (metals), log ug\/kg dw (organics)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: -4.2, 6.51\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Ese_status\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the standard error on the estimated log mean concentration in the last monitoring year\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: log mg\/kg dw (metals), log ug\/kg dw (organics)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.035, 1.56\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EEAC_id\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the identifier of the EAC measure or its equivalent\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: categorical\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nLevels: EAC, ERL, FEQG\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nEAC = Environmental Assessment Criterion\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nERL = Effects Range Low\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nFEQG = Federal Environmental Quality Guideline\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EEAC\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the value of the EAC or its equivalent\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: mg\/kg dw (metals), ug\/kg dw (organics)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.15, 1100\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Estatus_EAC\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the log ratio of the estimated mean concentration in the last monitoring year to the EAC (or its equivalent)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: dimensionless\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: -11, 1.45\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: a value above \/ below 0 indicates that the estimated mean concentration in the final monitoring year is above \/ below the EAC; the standard error is given by the variable se_status\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003EBAC\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the Background Assessment Concentration (BAC)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: mg\/kg dw (metals), ug\/kg dw (organics)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.05, 103\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Estatus_BAC\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the log ratio of the estimated mean concentration in the last monitoring year to the BAC\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: dimensionless\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: -3.1, 8.31\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote: a value above \/ below 0 indicates that the estimated mean concentration in the final monitoring year is above \/ below the BAC; the standard error is given by the variable se_status\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Etrend\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the estimated yearly change in log concentration\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: log mg\/kg dw\/y (metals), log ug\/kg dw\/y (organics)\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: -35, 34.8\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cstrong\u003Ese_trend\u003C\/strong\u003E\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nDescription: the standard error on the estimated yearly change in log concentration\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nUnit: dimensionless\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nType: continuous\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nRange: 0.6, 28.1\u003Cbr \/\u003E\nNote:\u003C\/p\u003E\n","format":"csv","state":"Active","revision_timestamp":"Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:59","name":"Sediment Summaries for the National Performance Framework Clean Seas Indicator 2019 and Scotland\u0027s Marine Assessment 2020","mimetype":"text\/csv","size":"143.68 KB","created":"Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:59","resource_group_id":"f96d4bd9-9492-4e8a-b459-d66dfec8d920","last_modified":"Date changed  Wed, 07\/22\/2020 - 15:59"}],"tags":[{"id":"f5b94f7d-b17e-4d84-ba68-c7bb5e8603f2","vocabulary_id":"2","name":"Bioassay and contaminant biological impact"},{"id":"bf06e161-3931-4373-80e0-4d226c938fbb","vocabulary_id":"2","name":"Concentration of other organic contaminants in biota"},{"id":"7cc26d29-0926-47d6-b33b-b710506d7928","vocabulary_id":"2","name":"Concentration of other organic contaminants in sediment samples"},{"id":"054b54f5-717f-46be-a287-5ab7863ccad0","vocabulary_id":"2","name":"Concentration of polychlorobiphenyls (PCBs) in biota"},{"id":"08960099-8a14-46b2-87ec-3c776221ec16","vocabulary_id":"2","name":"Concentration of polychlorobiphenyls (PCBs) in sediment samples"},{"id":"231d3fce-b961-4a73-9e72-1887f2e79531","vocabulary_id":"2","name":"Concentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in biota"},{"id":"6842d7f7-7919-4ee1-9100-64f849c67d7a","vocabulary_id":"2","name":"Concentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediment samples"},{"id":"ed4ac15b-ac24-47e3-9edc-d670bc2cc731","vocabulary_id":"2","name":"Concentration of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in biota"},{"id":"56dd271c-ddd2-4206-9ff4-db0022b7b72a","vocabulary_id":"2","name":"Concentration of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in sediment samples"},{"id":"bab84b10-7e19-4028-a7fc-aeb22c1e4505","vocabulary_id":"2","name":"Metal concentrations in biota"},{"id":"53863fd4-8f17-408f-a2db-cef3e7460947","vocabulary_id":"2","name":"Metal concentrations in sediment samples"},{"id":"a9618daf-b0b9-4d14-b292-58f1f0a333bf","vocabulary_id":"2","name":"Imposex (VDS) in dogwhelks"},{"id":"d86d73b9-a872-4226-91cc-8cefed30ed62","vocabulary_id":"2","name":"Ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activity in fish"},{"id":"8605b77d-d94b-4756-a5cc-e0c1b6116b2d","vocabulary_id":"2","name":"Concentration of bile metabolites in fish"}],"groups":[{"description":"\u003Cp\u003EMarine Directorate undertakes a wide range of monitoring covering many aspects of the Scottish marine ecosystem.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EMonitoring is undertaken in Scottish Inshore Waters, using networks of volunteers and automatic recording equipment, as well as in Scottish Offshore Waters, using the MSS research vessels MRV Alba na Mara and MRV Scotia.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EMarine Scotland Science also participates national monitoring programmes, such as:\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cul\u003E\n\u003Cli\u003EUK Marine Monitoring and Assessment Strategy (UKMMAS)\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli\u003EUK Marine Environmental Change Network (MECN)\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003Cli\u003EUK Marine Environmental Data and Information Network (MEDIN)\u003C\/li\u003E\n\u003C\/ul\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EThis group provides published data from monitoring these activities. For many activities, there are national or international standards for how the monitoring is undertaken.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","id":"f96d4bd9-9492-4e8a-b459-d66dfec8d920","image_display_url":"https:\/\/data.marine.gov.scot\/sites\/default\/files\/\/button%20220%20_1-02_1.png","title":"Monitoring","name":"group\/monitoring"}]}]}